Carlson Capital Management

Integrated Wealth Management

Menu
  • Our Firm
    • Who We AreFirmly grounded in foundational values, and intensely focused on each client’s well-being, Carlson Capital Management has been redefining partnership for more than thirty years.
    • Our TeamOur approach to wealth management is to surround you with a team of experts who work together to integrate all of the key financial disciplines into one plan.
    • HistoryKey events and milestones since the founding of our firm in 1987.
    • Community CommitmentIn the same way that we value the deep and lasting partnerships we have with our clients, we place a strong value on being partners in our communities.
    • Mission StatementOur team is guided by this mission each and every day. It’s what gets us up in the morning, and sometimes keeps us awake at night.
    • Zero Alpha GroupFounded in 1995, the Zero Alpha Group community is a national network of eight independent investment advisory firms.
    • Close
  • Our Clients
    • Client ProfileOur clients are individuals, families, businesses and foundations with many varying goals and situations, but one thing in common – the need and desire for integrated solutions.
    • Fiduciary StandardsIntegrity, trust, expertise and care are hallmarks of the CCM experience. They are at the root of all we do and the essence of who we are.
    • Fee StructureOur independent, fee-based status allows us to focus on one simple thing: what is in the best interest of our client.
    • Make a ReferralThe majority of new clients come from referrals from current clients. Access information that introduces colleagues and friends to Carlson Capital Management.
    • Close
  • Our Approach
    • Foundational ValuesOur deep commitment to each client we serve is built upon foundational values like honesty, hard work, and a strong sense of personal dedication.
    • Integrated ExpertiseOur unique, integrated approach to wealth management unlocks opportunities that our clients and their families deserve.
    • Disciplined PerspectiveOur long-term perspective provides the patience, guidance and discipline required for steady growth and protection.
    • Independent InsightOur independent, fee-based structure ensures the highest levels of objectivity, integrity, and fiduciary responsibility.
    • Close
  • Services
    • Integrated Wealth ManagementOur Integrated Wealth Management approach surrounds clients with a team who apply their expertise to integrate all of the financial disciplines.
    • Carlson PortfoliosCarlson Portfolios offers a solution for clients whose situations are less complex than a traditional CCM Integrated Wealth Management client.
    • Retirement Plan ServicesComprehensive integrated retirement plan solutions.
    • Institutional Portfolio ServicesInvestment advisory and fiduciary consulting for foundations, endowments and associations.
    • Risk ManagementSome things in life are predictable, while others are random. Managing risk is as important as seeking opportunities.
    • American Center for PhilanthropyWe develop and implement a philanthropic plan that matches your desire to make a difference and leave a legacy.
    • CCM Tax & Trust AdministrationA commonly-held affiliate of CCM that provides tax return preparation services.
    • Carlson TrustProvides trust solutions for clients whose financial, family or business needs require the services of a professional fiduciary.
    • Close
  • News and Resources
    • Recommended ReadingArticles and resources to give you access to our top picks in investment education, timely industry perspectives, interesting data and financial planning insights.
    • Articles and PublicationsA library of topical publications and articles written by CCM team members specifically for our clients.
    • CCM In the NewsA collection of articles, links and press releases featuring CCM, including interviews in publications and features in national industry rankings.
    • Video LibraryShort videos that introduce you to our team, our approach and the CCM story.
    • Women’s InitiativeResources and information related to CCM’s Women’s Initiative: Promoting the Financial Empowerment of Women.
    • Introduce CCM to OthersThe majority of new clients come from referrals from current clients. Access information that introduces colleagues and friends to CCM.
    • Close
  • Contact Us
    • Request a ConversationTake the next step in learning more about our integrated wealth management services by requesting a conversation with one of our advisors.
    • Contact Our TeamEmail one of our team members directly or send a general inquiry to the firm.
    • Client Servicing ContactsFind the CCM team member who can help with your specific question or request.
    • Join a MeetingJoin your scheduled meeting with Carlson Capital Management.
    • LocationsWe always appreciate the opportunity to meet face-to-face in one of our offices or at a location convenient to you.
    • CareersLearn about employment opportunities and apply online.
    • Close
  • Request a Call
  • Client Login

Déjà Vu—2020 or 1999?

James Yaworski – Carlson Capital Management
James Michael Yaworski, CFA

Senior Investment Strategist
507.206.2804
Email James

Professional Biography
James Michael Yaworski serves as Senior Investment Strategist at Carlson Capital Management. In this role, James is responsible for investment research, portfolio management, and client investment education. James monitors and reviews client portfolios to maintain balance across asset classes, makes recommendations for portfolios when out of alignment with models, reviews daily cash positions, and places trades through the custodial trading platform. He also provides new client portfolio analysis, asset class/portfolio research and analysis, prepares and presents client education materials, and manages other activities in support of overall client portfolio management.

James is a graduate of Northern Illinois University where he earned his degree in Finance. While studying at NIU, he gained insights into his future career as part of a student-managed portfolio team. Prior to joining CCM, James’ experience included working in the roles of investment manager, project manager in investment research, and financial analyst in both large and small financial organizations. James holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA Charter) designation, granted by the CFA Institute, which entails a rigorous exam requirement. He also represents CCM as chair of the investment research committee of Zero Alpha Group, a national network of eight independent wealth management firms.

In addition to the research James conducts related to building strong client portfolios, he is engaged in research on approaches that enhance institutional experiences as well. His most recent work sets out to provide institutional investors with a more robust way of constructing spending policies. In a paper published in the Financial Analysts Journal, James shows how current practices create poor long-term outcomes, resulting in declining support for beneficiaries over time. He also demonstrates how current methods expose trustees to significant fiduciary risk, and how small errors in implementation can have significant long-term ramifications on portfolio growth. His in-depth and thoughtful research stems from his genuine interest in providing university, public and private foundations, and endowment trustees with an approach that not only optimizes the outcomes of their portfolio’s performance, but also addresses their fiduciary responsibility with regard to spending policies. [You can read the accepted manuscript of James' paper here.]

James enjoys being engaged in the community with Habitat for Humanity and Paws & Claws. In his free time he also enjoys golfing and playing softball. James grew up in Crystal Lake, Illinois and now resides in Rochester, Minnesota with his wife, Brittany, their three young children, and two dogs, Frankie and Jordy.

Personal Thoughts
“I can do things you cannot, you can do things I cannot; together we can do great things.”  -Mother Teresa

I have grown to appreciate the importance of collaboration and teamwork in this industry. A group of individuals, each dedicated toward expertise in their respective fields, can help to piece together the puzzle of a family’s financial lives in an incredible manner. The end result is one which truly connects the math of an individual’s personal finances with the why that makes up who they are and what they want to achieve in life.

As a member of our investment team, I enjoy every aspect of this process; from our discovery meetings where we learn about financial goals, to the analysis and construction of a financial plan, to the educational meetings where we help put all the pieces into place. Ultimately, building a relationship with clients that centers on creating financial security and establishing confidence in their financial plan is extremely gratifying.

James and other members of the CCM Investment Team regularly post articles of interest including investment insights, recommended reading on timely topics, and articles on portfolio management which you can find here.

James Michael Yaworski
James Michael Yaworski, CFA
Senior Investment Strategist

For investors who recall the experience of 1999, it was either a fantastic year or a difficult one, depending on the types of stocks in their portfolio. Investors who concentrated their portfolio among growth companies, which earned little or no profits, remember 1999 as a fantastic year, delivering a return of 41%. Investors with the opposite philosophy, such as Warren Buffett, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, did not fare as well. Their focus on value companies with large profits lost 5% for the year. This difference in returns, a 46% out-performance for growth stocks with low profits, is by far the largest on record. 1 

To make matters worse, 1999 was the second year in a row in which this dynamic occurred. In 1998, growth companies with low profits outperformed value companies by 26%. Investors who traditionally have focused on fundamentals and the quality of corporate balance sheets had never experienced such dramatic results. In fact, it was the first time in history this had occurred two years in a row. Prior to 1998, the single best year for growth companies with low profits was 1967, when they outperformed value companies by 4.8%. 1 

From Warren Buffett

As you can imagine, investors such as Warren Buffett were challenged on their investment approach and asked to explain their strong underperformance during this time period. For context, prior to 1998, investing in value companies with strong profits outperformed those growth and less-profitable companies by nearly 7% per year for the previous 35 years. 1  What was happening, and what did it mean for the future of investing? 

Mr. Buffet addressed both questions in September of 1999: 2 

“Investors in stocks these days are expecting far too much, and I’m going to explain why. That will inevitably set me to talking about the general stock market, a subject I’m usually unwilling to discuss. But I want to make one thing clear going in: Though I will be talking about the level of the market, I will not be predicting its next moves. At Berkshire we focus almost exclusively on the valuations of individual companies, looking only to a very limited extent at the valuation of the overall market. Even then, valuing the market has nothing to do with where it’s going to go next week or next month or next year, a line of thought we never get into. The fact is that markets behave in ways, sometimes for a very long stretch, that are not linked to value. Sooner or later, though, value counts. So what I am going to be saying—assuming it’s correct—will have implications for the long-term results to be realized by American stockholders.”

Mr. Buffett addressed both the performance of certain types of companies as well as the performance of overall markets, because the two are inevitably linked. The strong performance of stocks where the companies made little to no money was entirely based on market euphoria, where investors were more focused on short-term price appreciation than the long-term fundamentals. Driven by a concentrated group of stocks, the run-up in one corner of the market drove overall market valuations to levels never seen before.

In the graph below, the price-to-earnings for the S&P 500 index is displayed from 1927 to 1999. In simple terms, a price-to-earnings ratio indicates what investors were willing to pay for one dollar of profit. Prior to the run-up in markets in the 1990s, the highest recorded price-to-earnings multiple for the S&P 500 index had occurred during the initial market panic of the Great Depression, at a multiple of 25.

Chart is for illustrative purposes only. Price to Earnings ratio based on data from the S&P 500 for the time period of January 1, 1927–July 1, 1999. Source: https://www.macrotrends.net/2577/sp-500-pe-ratio-price-to-earnings-chart

The Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway summarizes his speech with a forecast of the future. Addressing the crowd, with the market selling at 35 times earnings, 1  Mr. Buffett concludes: 2 

“Let me summarize what I’ve been saying about the stock market: I think it’s very hard to come up with a persuasive case that equities will over the next 17 years perform anything like—anything like—they’ve performed in the past 17. If I had to pick the most probable return … it would be 6%. If you strip out the inflation component from this nominal return (which you would need to do however inflation fluctuates), that’s 4% in real terms. And if 4% is wrong, I believe that the percentage is just as likely to be less as more.”

And when you look at history, Mr. Buffet is exactly right. Investors in the U.S. stock market would go on to capture a 5.5% average annual return over the next 17 years 1  because, as Mr. Buffett notes, “Sooner or later … value counts.” 2 

Market Performance Today

As it turns out, 1999 is not a once-in-a-lifetime event. Although the dynamics and narratives have changed, recent market performance strongly resembles the environment of the late 1990s.

This year, the market is on pace for a fourth straight year in which the best-performing stocks are growth stocks with low profits. This group, relative to value companies with large profits, has outperformed by more than 100% during this time period. In comparison, growth stocks with low profits collectively outperformed by 68% in 1998 and 1999. 1 

Looking back at 1999, investors shouldn’t have allowed themselves to be fooled into thinking that valuations didn’t matter. The same is true in our current environment. The spread between growth stocks and value stocks is currently wider than any period in U.S. history, including the late 90s technology bubble, as shown below. 

Chart is for illustrative purposes only. Data is from the S&P 500, for the time period of January 1, 1963–June 30, 2020. Methodology specifics included below.

Dispersion in the Market

The U.S. stock market today, as a result of highly unusual performance over the past three-and-a-half years, has never been more disperse. There is a large group of growth stocks, selling for a record valuation multiple, that generate very little in profit. There is another large group of value stocks selling for far more attractive valuations (lower multiples), while simultaneously generating strong profits. 

How has this market dispersion affected overall stock market valuations?  As shown in the graph below, the price-to-earnings ratio for the S&P 500 has returned to levels only experienced at the peak of the technology bubble.  We may not be repeating the technology bubble of the late 1990s, but it certainly feels a lot like déjà vu.

S&P 500 PRICE to EARNINGS RATIO 2000-2020

Chart is for illustrative purposes only. Price to earnings ratio is based on data from the S&P 500, for the time period of August 18, 2000–August 18, 2020. Source: FactSet

“The inescapable fact is that the value of an asset, whatever its character, cannot over the long term grow faster than its earnings do … The absolute most that the owners of a business, in aggregate, can get out of it in the end—between now and Judgment Day—is what that business earns over time.” 2 

 – Warren Buffett, Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway

What 1999 Tells Us About Today

What Mr. Buffett knew as he was prognosticating, but did not touch on in his 1999 speech, was that the future prospects for market returns as a whole were only of slight concern for value investors. By avoiding or reducing exposure to those expensive and less profitable companies, value investors were able to avoid much of the volatility and loss that resulted in the early 2000s when the technology bubble collapsed. An individual invested in that segment of the market, which had performed so well in 1998 and 1999, would go on to experience a loss of 61% over the following three years. 1  Meanwhile, the group of value stocks with large profits would gain 9% over the same time period, despite an economic recession. 1 

Clients of Carlson Capital Management are well attuned to the principles of discipline, diversification, patience, and focusing on what can be controlled. These past several years have put these principles to the test. Just like Mr. Buffett, we will not claim to know what the market has in store for us over the next week, next month, or the next year. However, we, too, believe that value counts. This market has become quite distorted in recent years, and while it presents challenges to portfolios with a value tilt, we cannot let this short-term market performance distort what we know to be true; fundamentals matter. 

We encourage all of our clients to appreciate the unique circumstances in which we find ourselves and take comfort knowing that our portfolios are well-positioned as we move closer to the inevitable realignment of market valuations.

View related video content here.


  1. https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html
  2. https://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/11/22/269071/index.htm

Methodology for Chart “U.S. Valuation Spreads 1963-2020: U.S. stock valuation spreads were calculated using market segmentation data from Ken French and Dartmouth’s research database. Investment quartiles were determined using book to market and gross profitability. Valuation spread shown measures the median book to market for the high book to market/high gross profitability quartile, divided by the low book to market/low gross profitability quartile. 

PLEASE SEE IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE INFORMATION

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Published September 9, 2020 Topics: Diversification, Investment Insight, Market Volatility, Valuation

DO NOT DELETE

News & Resources

  • Articles and Publications
  • CCM In the News
  • Recommended Reading
  • Video Library

Topics

Active Management Alternative Investments Annual Returns Bond Portfolio Brexit CCM Women's Initiative Charitable Giving Dimensional Fund Advisors Discipline Diversification Economy Estate Planning Financial Advisors Financial Planning Financial Planning for Women Inflation Integrated Wealth International Investing Investment Insight Investor Returns IRAs Market Conditions Market Volatility Politics and Markets Portfolio Management Rebalancing Retirement Planning Tax Planning Tax Reform Women and Investing

Contact Us

Contact us for a complimentary discovery meeting or for a second opinion on your current financial plan.

Contact Us

Email Updates

Sign up here to receive CCM articles and updates by email:

Subscribe

Our Clients

Client Profile

Fiduciary Standards

Integrated Wealth Management

Carlson Portfolios

Our Firm

Our Team

News and Resources

Locations

Careers

Compliance

Important Disclosure Information

Privacy Notice

Form CRS

Form ADV Part 2A

Contact Us

Request a Conversation

Contact Our Team

952.230.6700

© 2023 Carlson Capital Management, LLC, d/b/a Carlson Capital Management.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.